The Arizona Senate Bill 1070 brings to perspective the issue
about how the immigration laws should be enforced. A portion of the population may see the bill
as a necessary step to fight crime. However, the bill opens the door to
profiling by allowing police to interrogate anyone they may suspect is in the
country illegally. Furthermore, in the
case of being detained and not producing the required documents, a person can face
jail time, or a fine. Another issue this Bill addresses is that anyone who
employs, or transports an illegal immigrant will be penalized by law (Senate
Bill 1070, 2010).
The Bill is unconstitutional and should not have been
passed. One of the reason the passing of the Bill was successful, besides the manifestations
against it was that the political strategy was so well linked to the existing
realities of a declining economy which created the conditions amongst the
American people to blame illegal immigrants for the economic set back similar
to what happened during the great depression when immigrants where sent back across
the border under claims that they worsened the economic conditions of the U.S. (Karger,
Midgley, Kindle, & Brown,
2007).
Jansson, (2014) explains that grounding policy in the
current realities during a specific time frame can broaden the chances of the
policy to be passed. This is precisely what happened in Arizona when a portion
of the population saw the bill as being necessary to protect the American
people, but at what cost? Many simply forget that the Mexican people have been here
since before 1848 when the Mexicans were forced to sell their territories now
known as Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, parts of Utah, and Idaho (Karger,
et al, 2007). Profiling Hispanics basing police intervention on assumptions of
being an illegal immigrant is simply a violation towards the millions of
Hispanics that live and work in the United States legally.
The Senate Bill 1070 is oppressive to Hispanics by
permitting stigma to be applied to profile and target based on assumptions.
Based on the Senate Bill 1070, (2010) Illegal immigrants are an economic burden
on the U.S. What the Bill does not do is take into consideration are the many
benefits immigrants have on the economy. (Karger, et al, 2007) explains that
the need for inexpensive Mexican labor to sustain the economic capital of the
United States is met by Hispanics who cross the borders in search for work.
Oppressing and persecuting Hispanics will have detrimental effects on the
economy and can have outcomes that many have not foreseen.
The NASW, (2008) calls for social work professional to work
for and ensure social change especially on behalf of vulnerable populations. this Bill brings to the table a regression to
the times when skin color was used as the main indicator of inferiority or as a
reason to be pinpointed or excluded. After reaching many milestones initiated
from the civil rights movement, it is unacceptable to fall back to racial
profiling and targeting of individuals based on unspecified criteria which
grant law enforcement the right to speculate into if a person is in the U.S.
illegally solely by using criteria like last names, accent, skin color, or
race. Furthermore, aligning with this
bill puts at risk the concept of fairness and liberty and places the safety of
Hispanics that are in the U.S. at risk of being victims of prejudice,
discrimination, and exclusion solely based on how a person looks.
Miguel A. Soto, LMSW, LCSW
References
Jansson, B. S. (2014).
Becoming an effective social policy
advocate: From policy practice to social justice (7th ed.). Belmont, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Karger, H. J., Midgley, J., Kindle, P. A., & Brown, C.
B. (2007). Controversial issues in social
policy (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Retrieved from
http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/default.asp